
The chief advantages of PIN stripping are the small distal incisions and the possibility
that adjacent saphenous and sural nerves will be less damaged. Clearly, the distal
incision is so small that the vein is not dissected free of the nerve which is particularly important for the lesser saphenous vein and the sural nerve. Also, because
of the small diameter, PIN stripping is less invasive than conventional stripping.
The author of this article has a long interest in uncovering the cause of varicose
vein recurrence after surgery. For this report, 141 limbs were examined four or
more years after treatment by saphenofemoral ligation, and ligation of varicose tributaries
and communicating veins. This study shows that the surgical anatomy of the recurrent
system of veins developing after ligation is different from the pattern after stripping.
Recurrence was thought to be through newly formed vessels which became continuous with the greater saphenous vein. If the saphenous vein is left in situ, the communications
go directly to this vessel, and if the saphenous vein is absent, distal continuity
is established with normal superficial veins which subsequently become dilated and incompetent.
Oesch reports 609 cases with no nerve injury noted. In 50 cases, the stem vein being
removed was torn and required removal by the stab avulsion technique using hooks.
In a small number of cases, the proximal end of the stem vein was not firmly tied
and became disconnected.1
COMMENTARY
Oesch has improved the method of PIN stripping over that first published in 1993 in
the United States.2 The technique is particularly valuable for use on the lesser saphenous vein because
the sural nerve lies subfascially and particularly close to the vein in the distal
third of the leg. When used for the greater saphenous vein, the patient's abdomen
may interfere with manipulation of the proximal end of the stripper. Oesch removes any
torn, residual vein with hooks. However, there are alternative ways to do this,
including introduction of a conventional stripper using a tie which is left in the
stripper canal. Many phlebologists confirm that PIN stripping reduces nerve lesions. However,
few can equal Oesch's zero rate of nerve injury.
The PIN stripping technique presents an important forward step in vein surgery. I
expect it to find widespread use because of its reduction of nerve injuries, the
small incisions, and the general, minimally invasive nature of the procedure. 5696b
REFERENCES
1. Oesch A. PIN stripping: A novel method of atraumatic stripping. Phlebology 1993;
8:171-73.
2. Goren G, Yellin A. Minimally invasive surgery of primary varicose veins. Limited
invaginated stripping and tributary (hook) stab avulsion. Ann Vasc Surg 1995; 9(4):401-14.
A 47-YEAR-OLD WOMAN WITH A SWOLLEN LEG
Longworth DL, Stoller JK
Clev Clin J Med 1995;62:281-84
ABSTRACT AND COMMENTARY BY:
Travis J. Phifer, M.D.
Associate Professor of Surgery
Chief, Division of Vascular Surgery
School of Medicine in Shreveport
Shreveport, Louisiana
This article, written in the format of a review for Board exams, addresses diagnosis
and treatment of a popliteal cyst caused by Borrelia
infection (Lyme disease) presenting as unilateral calf swelling with a tender popliteal
fossa "mass." The differential diagnosis discussed in the article includes deep
venous thrombosis, popliteal aneurysm, popliteal cyst, muscular tear or rupture
(gastrocnemius, plantaris, soleus), infectious processes (necrotizing fasciitis, cellulitis),
hematoma formation, various neoplasms, and excess fat.
Since deep venous thrombosis coexists with a popliteal cyst in one-third of such
cases, the authors also recommend examination of the venous system after diagnosis
of a popliteal cyst. Duplex ultrasonography is particularly important as a diagnostic
modality for this problem, with sensitivity of about 70% for 1 to 2 cm. popliteal cysts
and greater than 90% for deep venous thrombosis. Arthrography and magnetic resonance
imaging are useful for more complex problems, including smaller cysts and meniscus
disease.
Etiologic possibilities for a popliteal (Baker's) cyst are the same as for acute monarticular
(knee) synovitis and include, as delineated in the article, both inflammatory and
non-inflammatory causes. However, rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis, as well as meniscal tears account for almost 95% of all popliteal cysts. These cysts often
coexist with conditions characterized by recurrent or persistent knee effusion, and
most frequently result from accumulation of synovial fluid in the gastrocnemic semimembranosus bursa communicating with the knee joint as an extension of the posteromedial
capsule. Precise resolution of the question of etiology requires, as with all monarticular
arthritis, synovial fluid analysis focused on white cell count and the presence or absence of crystals as well as appropriate tests for infection. Determination
of the exact cause of a popliteal cyst is of paramount importance in planning therapy.
Although autopsy slides show popliteal cysts in up to 50% of the general population,
such cysts are usually small and asymptomatic. Popliteal cysts associated with an
acute knee injury and an effusion often resolve after either spontaneous resolution
of the effusion or after removal of the fluid by arthrocentesis. However, untreated and
chronic effusions potentiate symptomatic popliteal cyst formation with subsequent
enlargement and distal dissection. Rupture of a cyst sometimes causes a pseudothrombophlebitic syndrome with ecchymosis below the malleolus (the "crescent sign") consequent
to blunt dissection of blood down fascial planes. Such bleeding poses a possible,
though uncommon, danger of treating presumed deep venous thrombosis with anticoagulants in the absence of documented venous thrombosis.
For inflammatory but non-infected cysts, general treatment measures include limitation
of activity as well as nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications and/or intraarticular
steroid injections. Any intraarticular mechanical problem such as loose cartilaginous bodies or meniscal flaps require arthroscopic correction. Treatment of infectious
cysts (commonly Gonococcal, Staphylococcal, and Streptococcal; uncommonly more indolent
process such as lyme arthritis and fungal arthritis) includes possible drainage as well as appropriate systemic antibiotic therapy. Surgical excision of a popliteal
cyst without investigation of its underlying etiology is often inadequate and associated
with cyst recurrence. In contrast, treatment of underlying conditions sometimes results in resorption of the cyst without further cyst enlargement or dissection.
COMMENTARY
This is an interesting discussion of a case of popliteal cyst caused by Borrelia
infection presenting as a swollen leg. Written as a review for Board exams in internal
medicine, the question-and-answer format is engaging as the reader works through
diagnosis and treatment of the problem. Although etiology of the cyst in the case
presented is unusual, the entity of popliteal cyst itself is common enough for serious
consideration in the differential diagnosis in most cases of leg swelling. Also,
concomitant occurrence of popliteal cyst and deep venous thrombosis in at least one-third
of cases of popliteal cyst emphasizes the importance of accurate diagnosis.
The differential diagnosis as well as diagnostic methods and treatment protocols presented
are reasonably standard and provide a good review but basically no new information.
The major value of the article is that it is a reminder of the complexity of the rather common problem of the swollen leg. Tunnel vision with inaccurate diagnosis
and incomplete treatment potentiates not only delayed resolution of the problem but
also increased morbidity. 5395b
MINI ABSTRACTS
John J. Bergan, M.D.
Items of Interest Which Have Crossed the Editor's Desk
(Provided for reference purposes and general interest)
Neovascularization in Recurrent Saphenofemoral Incompetence of Varicose Veins: Surgical
Anatomy and Morphology
Glass GM
Phlebology 1995; 10:136-42