In the third part of this article, the authors report their own 31 cases observed from the summer of 1993 to the summer of 1995. In 16 of the 31, the objective of the SEPS was to prevent recurrent ulcer. In these 16, severe lipodermatosclerosis definitely improved following the operation. In another 15 patients, the objective was to heal an existing ulcer. Thirteen of these had a history of ulceration of greater than five years. In 7 of the 13, the ulcer healed within four weeks, and in four more, the ulcer healed within eight weeks of surgery. One ulcer healed after six months, and in another, a femoral vein stent for May-Thurner syndrome and excision of the ulcer bed was necessary. The operation was done on an outpatient basis in 13 of the 31 cases, and low-molecular-weight heparin was given as prophylaxis against thrombosis and embolism in cases with a previous history of deep venous thrombosis.
Two cases illustrate the benefit of the method particularly well. In one, an 82-year-old, wheelchair-bound woman had a prior stripping procedure of the greater saphenous vein and skin grafting for an ulcer 8 x 12 cm. in size. The initial graft did take but subsequently sloughed, and the ulcer remained unhealed. An ambulatory endoscopic division of incompetent perforating veins was done under general anesthesia and within 16 weeks, the ulcer was healed and has remained healed since that time. In another case, a diabetic, 45-year-old man on permanent coumarin anticoagulant therapy and with symptomatic coronary artery disease, presented with a history of multiply recurrent deep venous thrombosis and a long-standing inframalleolar ulceration 2 cm. in diameter. After pursuing conservative ambulatory treatment, the ulcer remained painful and unhealed. At operation, stripping of the greater saphenous vein, phlebectomy of varicose clusters, and endoscopic division of incompetent perforating veins allowed the ulcer to become pain free immediately and healing was complete within 14 days.
These two cases illustrate the general experience of the authors that the subfascial
perforator vein operation, with or without stripping of the incompetent superficial
veins is an efficient adjuvant in surgical treatment of venous ulcers. It is apparent
that this is less invasive than the former Linton and other operations which have
been advocated.
This one-page article explores the technique of covering the subfascial endoscope
with an endotracheal tube and then blowing up the tracheal cuff balloon to create
additional space within which to work on perforating veins. This idea makes the
Storz instrument much easier to use.
COMMENTARY
It is a fact that almost all physicians seek professional information within their
own country and in their own language from their own colleagues. However, for the
best possible advanced treatment, there should be an exchange between international
experts in addition. This holds particularly true in the new and highly specialized field
of endoscopic subfascial vein surgery. This article is an example of such beneficial
international exchange across language barriers. At present, it is of special value that the American authors should present limited numbers of cases observed very closely
with available hemodynamic data.1 In contrast, German-speaking physicians in Europe tend to publish large numbers
of cases in the form of consensus documents and are slower to publish.2
This paper confirms the experience of the authors and others which document the fact
that the SEPS is a worthwhile adjuvant in venous surgery.3,4 Two aspects of the paper strike us on the other side of the Atlantic. First, in
contrast to Europe, in the United States, the SEPS can be done on a large scale on
an ambulatory basis. Second, anticoagulant prophylaxis against thromboembolism is
used when SEPS is done even though in the United States, such prophylaxis is not usual in
varicose vein surgery. The question arises does that mean that the United States
surgeons consider that the addition of SEPS to a stripping operation increases the
risk for thromboembolic complications? 5794b
REFERENCES
1. Bergan JJ, Murray J, Greason K. Subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery
(SEPS): A preliminary report. Ann Vasc Surg 1996;10:211-19.
2. Fischer R, Schwahn-Schreiber C, Sattler C. Ergebnisse der konsensuskonferenz ¸ber
die subfasziale endoskopie der Vv, perforantes des medialen unterschenkels. Phlebologie
(in press).
3. Gloviczki P, et al. Surgical technique and preliminary results of endoscopic subfascial
division of perforating veins. J Vasc Surg 1996; 23:517.
4. Gloviczki P, Bergan JJ, Menawat SS, et al. Safety, feasibility, and early efficacy
of subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS): A preliminary report from the
North American Registry. Presented to 50th Annual Meeting, Society of Vascular Surgery, June 1996, Chicago, Illinois. Submitted to J Vasc Surg.
THE LONG-TERM CLINICAL COURSE OF ACUTE DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS
Prandoni P, Lensing AWA, Cogo A, et al.
Ann Intern Med 1996; 125:1-7
ABSTRACT AND COMMENTARY BY:
Lois A. Killewich, M.D., Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Surgery
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland
This article describes a long-term, prospective cohort study in which 355 patients
with a first episode of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis documented by contrast
venography were followed for up to eight years to assess the risk of development
of recurrent venous thromboembolism, the postthrombotic syndrome, and death.
At the time of enrollment, demographic information, a medical history, and risk factors
for venous thromboembolism (VTE) were recorded. Each patient underwent contrast
venography and the majority were then treated with high-dose intravenous heparin
or subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin followed by three months of oral warfarin.
Patients with cancer, hypercoagulable states, isolated calf thromboses, or contraindications
to anticoagulation had modifications of this treatment strategy, although the modifications were not specified in the paper. All patients were instructed to wear
compression stockings for at least two years.
Patients returned for followup visits at three months, six months, and every six months
thereafter for a maximum of eight years. Interviews and physical examinations were
performed to determine whether patients had developed recurrent thromboembolism or
postthrombotic syndrome. In cases where the patient was thought to have experienced
a recurrent embolic episode, venography was repeated.
Seventy-eight patients suffered one or more episodes of recurrent thromboembolism.
These included 63 episodes of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and 15 episodes of pulmonary
emboli (PE), nine of which were fatal. The majority of these episodes occurred during the first two years of followup. By eight years, the cumulative incidence was
3.03%. The presence of cancer or documented hypercoagulable state increased the
risk of recurrent VTE while surgery and trauma or fracture were associated with a
lower risk.
Eight-four patients developed manifestations of the postthrombotic syndrome and at
eight years of followup, the cumulative incidence was 29.1%. Thirty percent were
considered "severe," meaning that significant symptoms (pain, cramps, heaviness,
pruritus, paresthesias) and signs (edema, induration, hyperpigmentation, and ulceration) were
present. The incidence of the postthrombotic syndrome increased most rapidly during
the first year following the initial episode of venous thromboembolism and thereafter, increased gradually over the first five years.
A total of 90 patients (approximately 30% of the study group) died during followup,
most commonly of malignancy.
COMMENTARY
The risk of symptomatic, recurrent VTE diagnosed in this group of patients was surprisingly
high (30.3% at eight years of followup). However, this study may have underestimated
the true incidence since only patients with symptoms of recurrent disease were reevaluated with contrast venography. If all patients had undergone diagnostic
testing, such as duplex ultrasound, to screen for the presence of recurrent VTE,
the incidence may have been much higher. Although the clinical significance of these
asymptomatic thrombotic episodes is not fully known, most physicians would institute anticoagulant
therapy after diagnosis. Therefore, this work could be criticized since many episodes
may have gone undiagnosed.
The high incidence of recurrent VTE noted in this study may be related to the high
incidence of cancer and documented hypercoagulable states (almost 30%) in the study
population since these disease states are known to be associated with increased risk
of venous thromboembolism. The literature supports the use of life-long anticoagulation
in patients with known hypercoagulable states after a first episode of VTE. The
authors of this study could also be criticized for not employing this strategy in
these patients. Moreover, some clinicians have suggested that either chronic anticoagulation
or vena caval filters should be employed in patients with VTE and known malignancy
for similar reasons.1
The incidence of the postthrombotic syndrome reported in this study was lower than
in previous studies.2 The authors suggest that this lower incidence may have been related to the use of
compression stockings but this has not been substantiated by previous work.3 One possible explanation would be that these patients had less extensive initial
thrombosis and thus developed less extensive valvular incompetence. However, since
no information is provided regarding either the extent of initial thrombosis or the
development of valvular incompetence, no conclusions can be drawn.
A final issue with this study is that approximately 30% of the participants died during
the study period, primarily due to malignancy. These patients may have behaved differently
with regard to the development of recurrent VTE or the postthrombotic syndrome than those who survived to the end, again calling into question the overall conclusions.
In summary, this is an important but flawed study that contributes to our overall
knowledge of venous disease. It also also leaves many unanswered questions and points
to the need for ongoing research in this important area. 5969b
REFERENCES
1. Hirsh J, Prins MH, Samama M. Approach to the thrombophilic patient. In: Colman
RW, Hirsh J, Marder VJ, Salzman EW (eds). Hemostasis and Thrombosis: Basic Principles and Clinical Practice, 3rd ed.
Philadelphia, Lippincott 1994; pp 1543-61.
2. Strandness DE Jr, Langlois Y, Cramer M, et al. Long-term sequelae of acute venous
thrombosis. JAMA 1983; 250:1289-95.
3. Killewich L, Martin R, Cramer M, et al. An objective assessment of the physiologic
changes in the postthrombotic syndrome. Arch Surg 1985; 120:424-30.
MINI ABSTRACTS
John J. Bergan, M.D.
Items of Interest Which Have Crossed the Editor's Desk
(Provided for reference purposes and general interest)
Endoscopic Subfascial Division of Incompetent Perforating Calf Veins
Paraskeva PA, Cheshire N, Stansby G, Darzi AW
Br J Surg 1996; 83:1105-06